SAMPLE REPORT Anonymized preview of the canonical Vantage Score deliverable. Specific cohort comparables, identifier-level citations, and full domain narratives are redacted; clients receive the complete report.
Vantage Score · Investor Tier · Portfolio Review

Your Vantage Score: NorthArc Vascular

Cohort-comparable diligence with measurable confidence — for a Series A vascular device targeting a novel post-EVAR indication.

VerticalDevice · Vascular EVAR
IndicationPost-EVAR endoleak management
Regulatory Pathway510(k) · Class II
Report DateMay 2026
6.8
± 1.2  [95% CI: 5.6 – 8.0]
Band: Investable with Conditions
Vantage Score TL;DR: PURSUE with targeted gap-closure — reimbursement pathway maturity is the highest-leverage near-term ask.
Chapter 1

Vantage Score: Comparable Companies

NorthArc is benchmarked against 43 named vascular-device peers in the Vantage cohort substrate. The realized-outcome distribution and pattern-mined differentiators below are what shape this report's recommendations — not the score in isolation.

Endologix (Nellix EVAS)
Class III · Acquired 2019
Failure
Shockwave Medical
Class II · IPO 2019 → J&J 2024
Success
Inari Medical
Class II · IPO 2020 → Stryker 2024
Success
[Comparable #4]
Redacted in preview
Active

What the success cohort did differently Cohen's d 0.52

Success cohort (N = 13)

  • Pre-submission engagement with FDA >12 months before pivotal
  • CPT code pursued in parallel with FDA submission
  • Operating-team depth in the specific therapeutic class
  • Pivotal trial powered for clinically meaningful endpoint, not surrogate

Failure cohort (N = 13)

  • Treated reimbursement as a post-launch problem
  • Pivotal trial endpoint accepted by FDA but rejected by payers
  • Operating team rotated mid-trial; institutional memory loss
  • Manufacturing scale-up began <6 months before launch
Vantage Score: Path-to-Success Projection
If NorthArc secures a Category III CPT code by Q3 2026 + advances pivotal trial enrollment to 60% by Q4 2026 →
outcome trajectory shifts from Failure-Cluster-B to Success-Cluster-A based on N=8 cohort comparables that followed the same path. Estimated revised composite at trajectory shift: 7.6 ± 0.9 [95% CI: 6.7 – 8.5].
Chapter 2

Vantage Score: Domain Findings

Vantage's framework maps to 4 marketing domains, each containing 5 proprietary subcategories. Per-domain scores render with Bayesian credible intervals to honor input uncertainty — never bare point estimates.

Clinical & Regulatory
6.4
± 1.1 [95% CI: 5.3 – 7.5]
5 subcategories: predicate strategy, pivotal trial design, FDA correspondence depth, indication scope, post-market surveillance plan
Technical & IP
7.2
± 0.8 [95% CI: 6.4 – 8.0]
5 subcategories: IP defensibility, manufacturing scalability, quality system maturity, supply chain depth, device engineering rigor
Commercial
5.9
± 1.4 [95% CI: 4.5 – 7.3]
5 subcategories: reimbursement trajectory, payer evidence base, commercial team readiness, market sizing rigor, competitive positioning
Organizational
7.7
± 0.7 [95% CI: 7.0 – 8.4]
5 subcategories: operating-team depth, founder credentials, capital efficiency, governance maturity, cap table cleanliness
Chapter 3

Vantage Score: Authors' Findings

Voice-differentiated analysis pairs a physician's clinical and regulatory lens with a biomedical engineer's design and manufacturing lens. Each chapter is signed by the appropriate author; cross-lens stress tests close every section.

Clinical & Regulatory — Arvind Ravinutala, MD

The 510(k) predicate strategy targets K950XXX as the substantial-equivalence anchor — a defensible choice given the device's hemodynamic mechanism overlap, though the predicate's age (10+ years) is the primary regulatory risk. Recent FDA "Best Practices for Selecting a Predicate Device" draft guidance increases scrutiny on predicate creep; NorthArc's strategy reasonably addresses this via second-predicate stacking, though pre-submission engagement should validate before pivotal lock.

Cross-lens stress test (Aswini, BME): manufacturing process validation should be timed to support the pivotal trial's device-handling protocols. Earlier IQ/OQ/PQ at the pivotal-trial scale reduces post-clearance scale-up risk.

Technical & IP — Aswini Ravinutala, BME

Manufacturing readiness is the differentiator most often underestimated in early Series A diligence on vascular device companies. NorthArc's design history file shows ISO 13485 alignment but the supplier qualification for the polymer scaffold component is single-sourced. Per 21 CFR Part 820 Subpart E, single-source critical components require documented backup qualification within 12 months of commercial launch — this is a tractable but unstarted workstream.

Cross-lens stress test (Arvind, MD): the single-source risk also has a clinical face — supply interruption during pivotal-trial-to-launch transition has stalled comparable companies' commercial uptake by 6-12 months.

Full domain narratives available in purchased report
  • Commercial domain: full reimbursement trajectory analysis + payer-coverage cohort comparison
  • Organizational domain: operating-team-depth pattern match against 26 outcome-labeled peers
  • Cross-domain composite reasoning with named cohort comparables per finding
Chapter 4

Vantage Score: Closure Roadmap

Every identified gap pairs with a path to closure. Each closure plan cites a cohort comparable that successfully closed the same gap — never generic best practices.

Commercial — Reimbursement Trajectory
Diagnosis
No active CPT code pursuit; payer coverage path undefined at Series A.
Treatment Plan
Engage CPT-code consultant (Q2 2026) + initiate AMA CPT Editorial Panel application by Q3 2026.
Measurable Milestones
90d: consultant onboarded · 180d: AMA application submitted · 365d: Category III code assigned.
Role Allocation
Lead: VP Commercial. Investor accountability: quarterly review at board.
Cohort comparable: Inari Medical secured Category III CPT 9 months pre-launch; pattern-matched timing.
Technical & IP — Manufacturing Supplier Risk
Diagnosis
Single-source polymer scaffold supplier; no documented backup qualification.
Treatment Plan
Identify 2 backup suppliers + initiate qualification per 21 CFR 820.50 within 12 months.
Measurable Milestones
90d: 2 candidates identified · 180d: design verification at candidate sites · 365d: full PQ at one backup.
Role Allocation
Lead: VP Quality / Manufacturing. Reassessment trigger: backup PQ completion.
Cohort comparable: 2 named device peers de-risked single-source exposure via this exact 12-month qualification cadence pre-launch.
6 additional gaps with full closure roadmaps available in purchased report
  • Clinical & Regulatory: pivotal trial enrollment pace + indication-scope refinement
  • Commercial: payer evidence-generation strategy + market sizing rigor
  • Organizational: post-Series-A governance maturation + cap-table cleanliness items
  • Technical & IP: 510(k) submission packaging + post-clearance surveillance plan
Chapter 5

Vantage Score: Open Questions for Client Follow-Up

When the data room is thin on specific client-knowledge facts, Vantage flags them explicitly rather than fabricating answers. Clients respond, the platform re-runs the affected domains, and confidence intervals tighten in a complimentary v1.1.

Sample of 3 of 12 client follow-up items in full report
  • Current cash runway and Series B target date (drives financial sustainability domain CI)
  • Board composition + operating-partner roster (drives organizational domain CI)
  • FDA pre-sub correspondence history (drives clinical & regulatory domain CI)

This is what your Vantage Score deliverable looks like.

The full report includes all named cohort comparables, complete domain narratives with voice-differentiated authorship, every closure-roadmap gap with cited cohort precedent, and a complete client follow-up appendix that tightens your confidence intervals as you respond.

View Pricing • From $2,500 → Schedule Discovery Call